Obligatory

climate iceberg melting thawing
The Crying Iceberg — Photo by Little Visuals on Pexels.com

A question for my fiction-writing readers:

Do you feel you have an obligation to address social concerns in your writing?

I’m wrapping up my line-editing, which means that my book is moving into the next stage, which also means that I’ve started to think about a new project. Often times, a new project percolates in my brain for months, if not years, before I am in a place that I can even start outlining the idea.

This is the space I am in right now.

The percolating stage. Smells strangely like coffee.

Anyway.

While bee-bopping around with different ideas, I read a post by writer Jeff VanderMeer about how writers who tackle near-future plotlines should make sure and address climate change. If you don’t know who Jeff VanderMeer is, he wrote Annihilation, which was made into a movie with Natalie Portman. Both the book and the movie are excellent (in slightly different ways), but they do address environmental issues.

If you, like me, started following him on Twitter after reading said book (or any of his others), you’ve most likely realized that he is an environmentalist. He tweets a lot about the work he does to make sure his yard is native to his area in Florida, as well as environmental concerns in general.

In one of those tweets, he addresses the need for writers to tackle climate change in their writing because climate change is a real and present aspect of life, and will be for the foreseeable future.

Which brings me to my question about obligation.

As writers, fiction writers in particular but any writer in general, do you feel that you have an obligation to address climate change in your work?

Or racism?

Or sexism?

Or… fill in the blank with a current social issue.

Now, quick deviate… I absolutely realize that racism and sexism have been around for as long as the human race has been roaming the world taking land from people and trying to garner greater wealth (read: power). And there is some amazing works of fiction that deal with these issues throughout that time period.

Climate change is a bit of a newer issue and the issue that led me down this meandering path of thought.

That being said, all three are clear social problems.

Do we, then, as writers, have an obligation to address them in our fiction?

I’ve written about tokenism in the past and I am going to mention it a little here. I frequently read books in which there is a gay character or a character of color in the story, but the character has no depth. Rather, it is as if the author put those characters in the story to check off some metaphorical box.

Opinion alert! Opinion alert!

Now, in my opinion (ha!), unless you are writing a plotline in the faaaaar future (or a different planet, reality etc.) in which none of the -isms exist, you cannot have an above-mentioned character without addressing the social constructs around said character. It is reality. Sure sure, we write fiction (the very definition of fiction is ‘made up’), as such, we can make up whatever we want…

…but should we?

Sexism.

Racism.

Xenophobia.

Climate change.

It is reality. Are we, as writers, required to address it? Do we have a responsibility to include social realities if we go down a path in which they are mentioned?

For instance, if I write a book set in the United States in 2045, do I have a responsibility to address climate change?

If I write in a gay character into a 1990s nostalgia book, do I have an obligation to address their reality at that time?

Personally, I absolutely believe I do have that responsibility, but why do I feel that way?

The job of being a storyteller is as ancient as racism and sexism. There have always been storytellers, always. It is a lineage stretching back millenniums. Within that lineage, there are truths and lies, and those stories that fall somewhere in between. There are stories that were once true, but now we know are false. There are those stories that have aged with us, universal language and universal understanding, and some stories that we now cringe at in horror, wondering how they were ever a reality.

Stories are an amazing reflection of the world we live in. In what is said.

And what is not said.

And that, perhaps, is where I land in this concept of obligation. As a creator, a carrier of this lineage, where is my responsibility in portraying our reality? And once that question is answered, what then, does that say about me as a storyteller?

I might have to mull on this a bit more.

But what about you, fellow writers? Where do you land on this issue? Do you avoid obligation altogether by writing things in which there is never a need to address one of the -isms, or climate change, or anything else?

Or. Do you fully tackle the issues because your work is about those issues?

Where do you land?

3 thoughts on “Obligatory

  1. You asked – so here ya go – cuz, I have strong IMHO thoughts on this question – off the cuff, viscerally? You’re writing it, you are not obligated to do anything but write your story – the best you can – for it to have meaning for you – fulfill your soul needs as a writer – IMHO – – 2nd? While many authors ‘write’ on such topics – either well, or dystopian – or what if this really plays out this way – can readers ‘experience how it could?” and ponder their own internal thoughts on the matter? their values? for me, when someone speaks passionately and with authenticity on their own perspective – whether in a blog, fiction offering, etc., to me? It’s a window into another perspective – maybe it’s well researched, maybe it’s not – maybe it’s possible, maybe it’s not – maybe the author is rather blind to their own blind spots, maybe, they are fully convinced and hoping to win converts – In the end, when I come across written works – from email to published books, that allow me to ‘journey through’ a different landscape/viewpoint, etc., and I experience the ‘hmmm… interesting, never thought to see from that view, before – – very, very interesting – what if?!? ” and, the works I often put down before reading fully? or revisit later? Or don’t care if it’s on best seller list? The ones that have ‘obligatory’ stuff in it, that doesn’t really add to the true story of both work and the author’s world, but for whatever reason, was put in for various reasons – which..in the end, does give me a ‘window’ into, but will I be loyal follower of work that shows, time after time, ‘edited to ad/address, but not passionate enough about it to fully flesh out/discuss/work into story line?” – – Nope – – just my two cents from both what ‘feeds my personal soul’ as a reader AND what I tend to write, when I don’t follow ‘advice/formulas’ – but just follow my heart – some of the worst, typo laden, grammar rule fails I’ve ever ‘published’ online, are ALSO the ones that are rather, perennially useful or entertaining to others – so go figure – being true, to one’s own voice, is, for me, on both sides, my quest as I journey through life as reader/writer (but don’t take any of this seriously – I’m not ‘published’ officially, though I have ‘publish credits’ in small amounts, here and there – and a blog – – LOL

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for opinions! I enjoyed reading through them. And I agree about being authentic to our voice and our passions; that truly is the best way to approach our work. As you mentioned, the stories that force the “obligatory stuff” is the tokenism I speak of, in which there is a metaphorical box being checked (or an actual box, who knows). Tokenism in this way usually results (99 percent of the time I’d say) in me putting the book down. Additionally, any time the author is trying to make a point by beating the reader over the head with an anvil, it isn’t going to end well. But, whether or not we address social realities, it IS, as you say, about staying true to the story we have to tell.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Yup – and, in the end, I guess, at least for me, a fascination over those ‘stories’ we read, that have no landing point in our personal experience – but are crafted just well enough – to draw us in, make us think – wonder ‘what if??!?:” I rarely find that ‘connection/landing point’ when stuff is done for ‘checkbox’ I GET authors/editors missing that a small character introduced in early drafts was deemed ‘not necessary’ in final cut and a small reference to, that missed ‘getting cut’ makes through to final work – I don’t get a book full of characters that just show up and ‘do’ what’s needed to ‘fit the argument/plot/story line” – – reminds me I’m reading – fiction, non-fiction, news…etc… tell me a story that I can read, WITHOUT being reminded I’m reading – the more often I’m reminded, the less I enjoy it – 😀

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s